One of the most notable moments from the first night of the Republican midterm convention was President Donald Trump saying he would give $5,000 to every adult citizen in the U.S. if Republicans maintain control of the House and Senate in November’s elections.
“I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000,” Trump said as he compared it to a $1,776 dividend he gave to service members December 2025. He added, “If the Republicans win. You win with us and you get $5,000. It will be called the ‘Trump dividend.’”
Other WRAL Top Stories
It was not the first time Trump promised money for Americans.
He said in 2025 that Americans would get $2,000 from the “trillions of dollars” in tariff revenue he said his administration has collected. (That revenue has not materialized, particularly after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled many of those tariffs unconstitutional earlier this year, requiring the government to initiate refunds.)
He also floated a $5,000-a-person “DOGE dividend” using presumptive savings from billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency cost-cutting effort in 2025. At the time, Trump said he loved the idea, but as with the tariff rebate, he never worked with Congress to make it happen nor tried to implement it via executive order, which would be constitutionally questionable.
Fiscal policy experts said the $5,000 payout will worsen the nation’s economic challenges because of its size and the lack of revenue to support it.
“The nation is staring down the barrel of a $40 trillion debt,” said Steve Ellis, president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, which tracks fiscal policy. “This proposal is ridiculous and wasteful and if it came to be, it would simply add to the debt and fuel inflation.”
Some have raised concerns about the promise amounting to a bribe for votes, but experts say it might be legally sound if it benefits all Americans.
How expensive would this proposal be?
After Trump’s surprise announcement at the convention, analysts projected that the payment could cost the federal treasury more than $1 trillion.
“This would cost about $1.2 TRILLION in just one year. That’s more than ALL THREE ROUNDS of COVID relief checks, despite no recessions,” Marc Goldwein, senior vice president and senior policy director for the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget wrote Sept. 10 on X.
The back-of-the-envelope math: $5,000 multiplied by 240 million adult U.S. citizens works out to $1.2 trillion. That’s more than what the federal government spends annually on Medicare ($997 billion), national defense ($916 billion) and interest on the federal debt ($970 billion).
It would be almost double the amount the federal government spends every year — combined — on veterans, transportation, justice, agriculture, science and the civilian space program.
Goldwein estimated that the additional cash floating around the economy could add 1.5 percentage points to an inflation rate that is currently 3.4% — higher than the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.
Goldwein’s group, which is fiscally hawkish, elaborated in a Sept. 10 press release that Trump’s proposal would be fiscally damaging when the federal debt recently passed $40 trillion.
“The more goodies politicians promise, the more ordinary Americans will pay the price at the grocery store, on their mortgage statements, or in the burden they leave their children,” Maya MacGuineas, the group’s president, said in a statement.
How likely are these payments to happen?
Making the $5,000 checks a reality faces enormous obstacles.
Congress would have to approve the payout, because the Constitution states that Congress has authority over government spending.
Some Republicans are lining up to help Trump, including Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, who said he will prepare a bill so the Trump dividend can pass immediately after the Nov. 3 election.
Still, it’s considered highly unlikely that Republicans could secure the 60-vote supermajority in the Senate required under current rules to approve such legislation.
Already, lawmakers declined to include a tariff dividend when they passed Trump’s signature tax and spending legislation, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in 2025.
Another issue that might make even some Republican lawmakers hesitant to back the idea is that the payout would almost certainly require new debt.
Trump has in the past cited “trillions” in tariff revenue as enabling such spending. But this figure is exaggerated.
Federal data collected by the Tax Foundation, a think tank, shows the federal government collected almost $363 billion in tariff duties from January 2025 to April 2026. Much of that will need to be refunded to American companies, because the U.S. Supreme Court struck down tariffs Trump imposed using the main law he used as justification. Those refunds are now in process.
Could the payment be considered a bribe to vote for the GOP?
Fox News anchor Bret Baier asked Vice President JD Vance whether critics could characterize the payout after GOP victories as “bribing voters.” Vance told him that the dividend would be for the “America middle class” and asserted that it could come from tariff’ revenue.
Legal experts told The New York Times that federal laws prohibit expenditure to influence voting decisions. However, they said it would be difficult to challenge it legally, saying the payment likely doesn’t qualify as bribery because Trump said it would benefit all Americans regardless of their individual vote.
In 2024, Musk announced a $1 million giveaway for registered swing state voters to sign a conservative petition in battleground states. In this case, Musk didn’t appear to break campaign finance law, which makes it illegal to pay people to register to vote, because the payment was for signing the petition, not for registration, NBC News reported.
Ellis also told us Musk’s giveaway is different from Trump’s proposal because he wasn’t using taxpayer money.
As he campaigned for Georgia Senate Democratic candidates Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock in 2021, President-elect Joe Biden promised $2,000 stimulus checks if the two won their Senate races. The federal government sent out two stimulus checks totaling that amount that year as COVID-19 relief, approved by bipartisan vote (following a similar check issued in March 2020 under Trump).
It’s unclear whether promising a rebate is fundamentally different from making campaign promises of a tax cut or new spending — something candidates from both parties do regularly.
“It looks bribe-like, but arguably it is not different from the sort of campaign promises politicians always make,” said Dean Baker, co-founder of the liberal Center for Economic and Policy Research. “The most disturbing part is that, since he already controls both houses of Congress, why didn’t he send out the checks already, if that’s what he wants to do?”