NC lawmakers take final vote to legalize online sports gambling

The bill would allow betting on professional, college and other sports on phones or other electronic devices.
Posted 6/7/2023, 5:44:00 PM Updated 6/7/2023, 6:51:05 PM

House Bill 3 47 the corporal rate

representative Bill Hawkins and Clements House Bill 3 47 a

bill to be entitled sports wagering horse racing

Wagering

The General Assembly of North Carolina and the gentleman from

Lincoln Representative Sain is recognized for motion

Thank you Mr Speaker

I would like to move that

We concur with the changes that the Senate sent over

on House Bill 3 47 Sports Wagering

Yesterday we had a great vote

I do appreciate the body allowing me to get out

of here very quickly because I barely got on a

plane with three minutes to go to go to Washington

DC

Had the opportunity to present Senator Tom Tillerson award in

DC last night

So that was a lot of fun and they made

it back uh a little late

But today I hope we have the uh a very

similar vote

Really appreciate all the support uh all the debate that

has happened throughout this process not just in the house

side or the senate side but in committee as well

I just appreciate your support

Thank you

The gentleman has moved that the house to concur with

Senate Committee substitute House Bill 3 47 for what purpose

does the Lady from Guilford Representative Harrison rise to briefly

debate the bill

Um Thank you Mr Speaker

Um ladies and gentlemen in the house

I I don't want to repeat all the points that

I made in the previous debate when this bill was

on the house floor but I want to highlight a

couple of things

Um this predatory gambling bill is still predatory um and

is going to hurt North Carolina and it doesn't look

like we're going to achieve very much in exchange

But I but I want to thank represents San and

the others who worked on some of the improvements

I think that removing the deductions is is a big

improvement on the bill

The tax deductions and raising the income tax rate to

18 percent is also an improvement over the 14% that

it was once in this house

But I will add that I still um will uh

claim that this is an this is uh not constitutional

because we have income tax in our in our constitution

at 7%

So what I haven't been able to discern is what

happens if the 18% income tax is challenging

State court is is thrown out and then we don't

even have the revenue from uh the income tax to

fund the oversight

And um and and the additional revenue that this gambling

legalizing gambling is supposed to provide for our state So

that's a problem

Um uh a lot of us are particularly bothered by

the additional horse racing

It was deliberately taken out in the house and now

it's back in in the Senate

And I will just say to you all that Churchill

downs shut down because of 12 dust of the last

five weeks

Um Seven of which occurred in the week before the

Kentucky Derby

This is an inhumane terrible terrible industry and this is

um that's emblematic that uh there is a problem with

that industry

900,900 horses died in 2020 to 900 thoroughbreds who are

involved in racing died

And um there is uh that to me I don't

know why it was added

I I it would have been nice to have some

more thorough debate and and I don't know if the

lottery commission is actually gonna regulate horse racing and if

they're qualified to regulate horse racing I know it's complicated

and many states have their own set ups and they're

all different and I would just say that the effective

date

Um I ca I can't tell if that's an improvement

or not

January 8th 2024 is still too soon

That's a little bit more than six months away to

set up a gambling regulatory structure in our state

So I I still have problems

I appreciate the improvements that were made in the Senate

I know y'all worked on it very hard

Representatives saying but I encourage you to vote no on

this motion to concur

Thank you for

What purpose does the gentleman from wake represent Jones Rise

speak to the motion in the bill has four

Uh appreciate the chance to speak

Uh I didn't know if we're gonna get it yesterday

So I thank you for that

I will be quick

Uh I'm against this bill because gambling is a predatory

industry

I think nobody in here would doubt that

Ultimately the only person the only entity that really gains

won't be North Carolina won't be the guys that go

have fun in gambling

It'll be the gambling industry that ultimately is the only

entity that gains in the end

That's why they're doing such a good job getting it

to us because they will profit

We will not even with the increased tax revenue uh

gallons a vice

I put it right along with uh and it brings

other cousins with it

It brings in many instances where we know gamblin is

in Vegas and Jersey City uh loan sharking prostitution and

I put it right in there with cock fighting and

some of the other things that we know are unsavory

Uh lastly al I mean secondly I mean thirdly uh

we also um I think the gambling preys on the

weak

Uh many people are addicted to it and it breaks

up families

We used to have an insurance company around

I don't remember which one it was we used to

say we protect the family and in this body I

think we need to protect the family

This hurts families

It doesn't help families

I'm a family man leaving my family love my family

I'm sure all of you do

But there are people out there who are weak who

will go gamble and won't protect their family

We should protect those families for them

Another point I wanna make I saw in the paper

that um the first year we're gonna get $8.5 million

of tax revenue in the next year 36 million

But we we are flush right now in North Carolina

we had couple billion left over last year maybe three

probably gonna have that much left over this year

So we don't need this money to bring this industry

in

They need to stay out of here

They're gonna hurt people real people are going to be

hurt

And then the last thing I wanna say just uh

kind of a law school argument but it's true

It's just bad public policy and we about the business

of making good public policy

So I urge you to vote

No if you would just think about it in your

heart about what we're doing today

Thank you for letting me be heard

For

What purpose does the gentleman from Mecklenburg represent Walt Ross

to speak to the motion

Gentlemen has four

Uh Thank you Mr Speaker

Uh Ladies and gentlemen uh this is still a bad

bill and it's bad for North Carolina and it's bad

for the North Carolina citizens

But I'll just let me point out that one of

the things about the house version of the bill was

the ban on betting during college sports events or eight

hours prior to those events and on the property of

those events the Senate version removes that prohibition on sports

wagering at a sports facility during or eight hours prior

to a college game being played at the facility or

the adjacent to that facility

Just another bad bill that got a little bit worse

when it went to the Senate

I would encourage all the members to vote

No on this bill

Thank you

for what purpose LA from ribs and rice

Thank you Mr Speaker

And we do appreciate very much being able just to

briefly debate this bill again

I know we did it when it was first on

the floor and I would just add to what my

colleagues have said the integrity of sports

I think we are really harming the integrity of pure

sports by putting gambling in

People will be now more interested in the spread than

they will in the victory or the defeat

And I think it's a sad day for athletes and

a sad day for people that will become addicted and

we only put $2 million in for addiction treatment

We're going to need a lot more

A lot of families a lot of people will suffer

I wish we could have limited this

So it won't be in our on our mobile phones

on our billboards

Everywhere we look we are going to be inundated by

the advertising

This is going to result in

But thank you for the opportunity to speak

I appreciate it for the discussion for the debate

If not the question for the house is the adoption

of the motion concur with the Senate committee substitute to

House Bill 3 47

Those in favor will vote I those opposed to vote

No the court will open the vote

lock

The machine recorded the vote 68 having voted in the

affirmative 45 in the negative

The has the house has voted to concur with the

Senate committee substitute to House Bill 3 47

The bill is ordered enrolled and sent to the governor